Hi, as most on the list here I also see the future of storage in ceph. I think it is a great system and overall design, and sage with the rest of inktank and the community are doing their best to make ceph great. Being a part-time developer myself I know how awesome new features are, and how great it is to implement them. On the other hand I think cuttlefish is in a state where I am not feeling easy when saying: ceph is stable, go ahead, use it. I do happen to have to do a lot of presentations on ceph recently, and I'm doing a lot of lobbying for it. I also realize that it's not easy to develop a distributed system like ceph, and I know it needs time and a community to test. I'm just wondering if it might be better for the devs to keep their focus right now on fixing nasty bugs (even more as they do already), and make the mon's and osd's super-stable. I have no insight on the development cycles, so chances are you're doing this right now already. I'm just saying: I'd love to see ceph take over the storage world, and for that we need it in super stable states. Then ceph can succeed big time. Sorry for the noise, but I really wanted to get rid of this :) Wolfgang _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |