Re: RDMA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 18 Apr 2013, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
> 2013/4/18 Mark Nelson <mark.nelson@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > Well, even with RDMA you probably aren't going to get much more than
> > ~3.2GB/s (or at least that's what I saw on our production clusters at my
> > last job).  There's encoding overhead so you can't get the full 40Gb/s.
> >
> > Beyond that, it's just another software layer with the associated
> > inefficiencies.  Frankly I'm kind of amazed that rsockets can supposedly get
> > around 3GB/s.  That's impressive performance imho.
> 
> What about SDP ? It should be a transparent TCP replacement that will
> operative natively on an IB fabric with huge speed improvement and
> almost none overhead:
> 
> http://bit.ly/14zQzME  - Page 43 (4.3.1)

I'm no expert, but I've heard SDP is not likely to be supported/maintained 
by anyone in the long-term.  (Please, anyone, correct me if that is not 
true!)  That said, one user has tested it successfully (with kernel and 
userland ceph) and it does seem to work..

sage
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux