Hi, that's the config http://pastebin.com/2JzABSYt ceph osd dump http://pastebin.com/GSCGKL1k ceph osd tree http://pastebin.com/VSgPFRYv As far as I can tell they are not mapped right. sdmap e133 pool 'rbd' (2) object '2.31a' -> pg 2.f3caaf00 (2.300) -> up [13,23] acting [13,23] -martin On 28.03.2013 01:09, John Wilkins wrote: > We need a bit more information. If you can do: "ceph osd dump", "ceph > osd tree", and paste your ceph conf, we might get a bit further. The > CRUSH hierarchy looks okay. I can't see the replica size from this > though. > > Have you followed this procedure to see if your object is getting > remapped? http://ceph.com/docs/master/rados/operations/monitoring-osd-pg/#finding-an-object-location > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Martin Mailand <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I want to change my crushmap to reflect my setup, I have two racks with >> each 3 hosts. I want to use for the rbd pool a replication size of 2. >> The failure domain should be the rack, so each replica should be in each >> rack. That works so far. >> But if I shutdown a host the clusters stays degraded, but I want that >> the now missing replicas get replicated to the two remaining hosts in >> this rack. >> >> Here is crushmap. >> http://pastebin.com/UaB6LfKs >> >> Any idea what I did wrong? >> >> -martin >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |