On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Mark Nelson <mark.nelson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 03/17/2013 06:46 AM, Andrey Korolyov wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> from osd tree: >> >> -16 4.95 host 10.5.0.52 >> 32 1.9 osd.32 up 2 >> 33 1.05 osd.33 up 1 >> 34 1 osd.34 up 1 >> 35 1 osd.35 up 1 >> >> df -h: >> /dev/sdd3 3.7T 595G 3.1T 16% /var/lib/ceph/osd/32 >> /dev/sde3 3.7T 332G 3.4T 9% /var/lib/ceph/osd/33 >> /dev/sdf3 3.7T 322G 3.4T 9% /var/lib/ceph/osd/34 >> /dev/sdg3 3.7T 320G 3.4T 9% /var/lib/ceph/osd/35 >> >> -10 2 host 10.5.0.32 >> 18 1 osd.18 up 1 >> 26 1 osd.26 up 1 >> >> df -h: >> /dev/sda2 926G 417G 510G 45% /var/lib/ceph/osd/18 >> /dev/sdb2 926G 431G 496G 47% /var/lib/ceph/osd/26 >> >> Since osds on 10.5.0.32 does not contain garbage bytes almost for >> sure, seems to be some weirdness in the placement. Crush rules are >> almost default, there is no adjustment by node subsets. Any thoughts >> will be appreciated! > > > Hi Andrey, > > How many PGs do you have in your pools? > 25k in the ``primary'' one, to which belongs 99 percent of all commited bytes. > Mark > >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |