On 03/17/2013 06:46 AM, Andrey Korolyov wrote:
Hi, from osd tree: -16 4.95 host 10.5.0.52 32 1.9 osd.32 up 2 33 1.05 osd.33 up 1 34 1 osd.34 up 1 35 1 osd.35 up 1 df -h: /dev/sdd3 3.7T 595G 3.1T 16% /var/lib/ceph/osd/32 /dev/sde3 3.7T 332G 3.4T 9% /var/lib/ceph/osd/33 /dev/sdf3 3.7T 322G 3.4T 9% /var/lib/ceph/osd/34 /dev/sdg3 3.7T 320G 3.4T 9% /var/lib/ceph/osd/35 -10 2 host 10.5.0.32 18 1 osd.18 up 1 26 1 osd.26 up 1 df -h: /dev/sda2 926G 417G 510G 45% /var/lib/ceph/osd/18 /dev/sdb2 926G 431G 496G 47% /var/lib/ceph/osd/26 Since osds on 10.5.0.32 does not contain garbage bytes almost for sure, seems to be some weirdness in the placement. Crush rules are almost default, there is no adjustment by node subsets. Any thoughts will be appreciated!
Hi Andrey, How many PGs do you have in your pools? Mark
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
