On 2019/12/20 19:09, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Fri, 2019-12-20 at 11:46 +0100, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 10:21 AM Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2019/12/20 17:11, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 1:44 AM <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx>
Just in case the session's refcount reach 0 and is releasing, and
if we get the session without checking it, we may encounter kernel
crash.
Rename get_session to ceph_get_mds_session and make it global.
Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changed in V3:
- Clean all the local commit and pull it and rebased again, it is based
the following commit:
commit 3a1deab1d5c1bb693c268cc9b717c69554c3ca5e
Author: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed Dec 4 06:57:39 2019 -0500
ceph: add possible_max_rank and make the code more readable
Hi Xiubo,
The base is correct, but the patch still appears to have been
corrupted, either by your email client or somewhere in transit.
Ah, I have no idea of this now, I was doing the following command to
post it:
# git send-email --smtp-server=... --to=...
Hrm, I've looked through my archives and the last non-mangled patch
I see from you is "[PATCH RFC] libceph: remove the useless monc check"
dated Oct 15. If you are using the same send-email command as before
and haven't changed anything on your end, it's probably one of the
intermediate servers...
And my git version is:
# git --version
git version 2.21.0
I attached it or should I post it again ?
You attached the old version ;) It's not mangled, but it doesn't
apply.
Jeff, are you getting Xiubo's patches intact?
Yep. This patch applied just fine using git-am. Patch looks reasonable
to me -- I like guarding against a 0->1 transition on a refcount. I'll
go ahead and push it to testing.
Cool.
Thanks.
Thanks,
