Re: [PATCH v3] ceph: rename get_session and switch to use ceph_get_mds_session

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2019-12-20 at 11:46 +0100, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 10:21 AM Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 2019/12/20 17:11, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 1:44 AM <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > 
> > > > Just in case the session's refcount reach 0 and is releasing, and
> > > > if we get the session without checking it, we may encounter kernel
> > > > crash.
> > > > 
> > > > Rename get_session to ceph_get_mds_session and make it global.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > 
> > > > Changed in V3:
> > > > - Clean all the local commit and pull it and rebased again, it is based
> > > >    the following commit:
> > > > 
> > > >    commit 3a1deab1d5c1bb693c268cc9b717c69554c3ca5e
> > > >    Author: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >    Date:   Wed Dec 4 06:57:39 2019 -0500
> > > > 
> > > >        ceph: add possible_max_rank and make the code more readable
> > > Hi Xiubo,
> > > 
> > > The base is correct, but the patch still appears to have been
> > > corrupted, either by your email client or somewhere in transit.
> > 
> > Ah, I have no idea of this now, I was doing the following command to
> > post it:
> > 
> > # git send-email --smtp-server=... --to=...
> 
> Hrm, I've looked through my archives and the last non-mangled patch
> I see from you is "[PATCH RFC] libceph: remove the useless monc check"
> dated Oct 15.  If you are using the same send-email command as before
> and haven't changed anything on your end, it's probably one of the
> intermediate servers...
> 
> > And my git version is:
> > 
> > # git --version
> > git version 2.21.0
> > 
> > I attached it or should I post it again ?
> 
> You attached the old version ;)  It's not mangled, but it doesn't
> apply.
> 
> Jeff, are you getting Xiubo's patches intact?
> 

Yep. This patch applied just fine using git-am. Patch looks reasonable
to me -- I like guarding against a 0->1 transition on a refcount.  I'll
go ahead and push it to testing.

Thanks,
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux