On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 10:54 AM Vasu Kulkarni <vakulkar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 4:54 AM Dario Maiocchi <dmaiocchi@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > i would like to create a generic libvirt backend forteuthology. > > > > I have already created a RFC feature on upstream tracker: > > > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/36714, where i discuss (really) shortly. > > > > If you have any feedback or you would like to join efforts/collaborate > > feel free to ping me on the issue or here ! > > If you are looking for qemu/kvm, then i dont think there is anything > that is helpful in teuthology right now for you to look into, the > openstack api in > teuthology uses libcloud and the libcloud lacks basic api's to work with qemu. ...and I just realized I mistook libvirt for libcloud when thinking about this — sorry about that! :o So yes, I'm curious what exactly you mean by a libvirt backend — is the goal to provision VMs on-demand in a libvirt-based infrastructure? We have plenty of VMs in the upstream sepia lab, but we just provision them statically and they look mostly like normal machines to teuthology AFAIK. -Greg > > Personally I think its a big win if we can get this going with > qemu/kvm since it will decentralize's the testing and one can use the > local enviornment > to test out it but there are lot of layers to integrate (like local > server capacity/dns/ipmi etc) and also integrate just the > paddles/pulpito for overall view of test run > or a different layer can be brought in to share the results. > > Is that what you are looking for? > > > > > > > > > Thank you and enjoy your day, > > > > > > Dario > >
