On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 3:54 PM, Ricardo Dias <rdias@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 04-05-2018 03:57, Sage Weil wrote: > >> >> I retargetted all the mimic branches at the mimic branch (i.e., option 2) >> but I'm sort of thinking option 1 is less confusing. Any strong opinions? yeah, it helps to avoid rebasing these PRs if they were targeting master, which is in flux. and i am for option 1 also. as this model is simpler and, yeah, less confusing. > > > +1 to option 1. > > From a developer perspective it's easier to have every commit in a single > branch, specially if some new nautilus feature depends on a mimic bug fix. > >> >> > > -- > Ricardo Dias > Senior Software Engineer - Storage Team > SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, > HRB 21284 > (AG Nürnberg) > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Regards Kefu Chai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
