Re: mimic is forked

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 04-05-2018 03:57, Sage Weil wrote:


I retargetted all the mimic branches at the mimic branch (i.e., option 2)
but I'm sort of thinking option 1 is less confusing.  Any strong opinions?

+1 to option 1.

From a developer perspective it's easier to have every commit in a single branch, specially if some new nautilus feature depends on a mimic bug fix.




--
Ricardo Dias
Senior Software Engineer - Storage Team
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
HRB 21284
(AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux