Re: 12.2.5 QE Luminous validation status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



ceph-deploy has more then 50% jobs failed, unlike any other suite!

Sage already asked (not sure if he got anyone interested), but it's
difficult to believe that from our user base we have no-one
interested.
Trying again...
Anyone interested to be a maintainer of ceph-deploy?

Abhishek, Nathan, could you pls take a look at issues noted by Vasu
and see if something had been missed form backporting?
(maybe the same case on jewel)

Thx
YuriW


On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Vasu Kulkarni <vakulkar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 9:18 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Details of this release summarized here
>> https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/23405#note-4
>> The following suites included:
>>
>> rados - Josh approve?  see bugs logged
>> rgw - Casey, Matt approve? see known bugs
>> rbd - Jason approve?  see bugs logged (run on default OS only)
>> krbd - Ilya approved (run on default OS only)
>> fs
>> kcephfs
>> multimds - Patrick approve? seems like infra noise
>> knfs - Patrick approve?  see bugs logged
>> hadoop - EXCLUDED
>> samba - EXCLUDED
>> ceph-deploy - Sage, Vasu approve? see bugs
>
> a) rbd pool create is failing in the workunit after install which was
> a change in master, I see this commit already exists in qa-branch:
> luminous
>     https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/49f95b3d8b43bb22c0faf15f05d11ac3cbe1fad6,
> so I am not sure how the workunit doesn't have that change
> b) for couple selinux issue, the pr is still pending in master
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/20118
>     either ldconfig can be whitelisted or that can go into backport.
> both are not major issues, so Approved.
>
>>
>> ceph-disk
>> upgrade/client-upgrade-hammer (luminous)
>> upgrade/client-upgrade-kraken (luminous)
>> upgrade/client-upgrade-jewel (luminous)
>> upgrade/jewel-x (luminous)
>> upgrade/kraken-x (luminous)
>> upgrade/luminous-x (master) - EXCLUDED
>> powercycle - Sage approve? see bugs logged
>> ceph-ansible - see minor infa noise
>> ceph-volume - Alfredo approve?
>> (please speak up if something is missing)
>>
>> The validation process was changed a little as following:
>>
>> a suite runs
>>   if there failures, they rerun 2x/3x time
>>      if they pass => suite passed
>> additional limited (10 or 20 jobs) run on supported OSes (centos, trusty)
>>
>> Note: some suites did not run on all OSes as they had conflicts in
>> yaml fragments and were not able to be scheduled with "--distro XX
>> --distro-version YY" option(see suits' notes above).
>>
>> Sage, assuming we collect all approvals and you blessing we will be
>> ready to publish.
>>
>> Thx
>> YuriW
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux