Re: dev branches in ceph.git

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 11:08 AM, John Spray <jspray@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 3:45 PM, Alfredo Deza <adeza@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I probably missed this, but just wanting to confirm that we are no
>> longer having development branches in ceph.git
>
> Yes -- we've been opening PRs from personal repos since around the
> time that the support for specifying --suite-repo --ceph-repo etc was
> added to teuthology.
>
>> If that is the case, none of the ceph-volume, ceph-ansible,
>> ceph-container jobs, including jobs that clone the repo/branch will
>> work, and will take significant effort to update.
>
> What happens if someone does a PR from a repo other than ceph/ceph.git
> currently?  Jobs just don't run?

Jobs run, but they fail since the branch just doesn't exist in ceph.git

We are to blame here :) since this was just the way we had dev
branches before, there wasn't any motivation to add more flexibility.

>
> John
>
>
>
>> This also gets trickier when wanting to test branches like luminous,
>> but with packages from ceph-ci.git :(
>>
>> We can make the update, just want to be certain this is where we are,
>> and that all development branches will have to go to ceph-ci.git (when
>> repos are needed) or personal forks.
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux