(resend, plain text) >From my understanding, this makes sense and covers at least most setups not doing multi site replication or es or the new cloud sync. Matt On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 3:04 AM, Patrick Nawracay <pnawracay@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > as the initial PR of the dashboard_v2 module is being finalized, we have > started to think about implementing some of the features which are > already implemented in openATTIC. > > Within openATTIC we have implemented a very basic reverse proxy for > communicating with the RGW Admin Ops API. This enables the frontend to > perform certain administrative tasks. Since the dashboard_v2 module is > now part of Ceph, we want to retrieve the necessary connection data > automatically. This is beneficial because > > - it saves users from manually configuring the RGW and - more > importantly - > - allows to automatically failover to a working Ceph MGR instance, > when the one talked to has gone down for any reason. > > Doing so seems reasonable, but we want to ensure that this won't have > unwanted side effects for some configurations, especially when thinking > about zone groups and/or realms. > > The first implementation shall detect and exclusively talk to the > current master zone of the current realm. Would this be suitable for a > first implementation and (likely) most setups? > > What else needs to be considered? > > Thanks for your feedback! > > Patrick > > -- > SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) > > -- Matt Benjamin Red Hat, Inc. 315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103 http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage tel. 734-821-5101 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
