Re: bi-directional cloud sync

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 3:16 AM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub
<yehuda@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Now that the sync-to-the-cloud work is almost complete, I was thinking
> a bit and did some research about bi-directional sync. The big
> difficulty I had with the syncing from the cloud process is the need
> to rework the whole data sync paths where we identify changes. These
> are quite complicated, and these kind of changes are quite a big
> project. I'm not quite sure now that this is needed.
> What I think we could do in a relatively easy (and less risky) way is
> that instead of embedding a new mechanism within the sync logic, we
> can create a module that turns upstream cloud changes into the
> existing rgw logs: that is, data log, and bucket index logs (no
> metadata log needed). In this way we break the problem into two
> separate issues, where one of the issues is already solved. The
> ingesting rgw could then do the same work it is doing with regular
> zones (fetching these logs, and pulling the data from a remote
> endpoint) -- albeit with various slight changes that are required
> since we can't have some of the special apis that we created to assist
> us.

Sounds like a good plan, it may increase the time we detect changes.
If we can give the user an estimation I think it will be acceptable.

> We'll need to see how these could be replaced and what will be the
> trade offs, but we'll need to do that anyway with any solution.
> The changes discovery module that will turn remote cloud changes into
> local logs could do it by either polling the remote endpoints, or (for
> S3 for example) could use buckets notifications mechanism. It will
> build its local changes logs by setting new entries on them according
> to the changes it identifies. The radosgw zone that will sync from the
> cloud will have two endpoints one that will be used to fetch the the
> logs, and another one that will be used to sync in the data.
> I'm a bit simplifying it, there are a few more issues there, but
> that's the gist of it.
>
> Any thoughts?

can this used for syncing indexless buckets?

Regards,
Orit

>
> Yehuda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux