Re: 12.2.3 QE Luminous validation status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Outstanding issues remaining:

upgrade/kraken-x => http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/22740 fixed by
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/20451 (thanks for clues Jason!),
Abhishek assigned to you for merge

knfs => http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/22995 Sage pls approve.



On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Jason Dillaman <jdillama@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks -- just looks like that test needs the same blacklist applied
> that PR 20053 performed on the other kraken-x upgrade test (or we just
> fix the broken builders for kraken so the broken test can be yanked).
>
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 12:33 PM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Jason
>>
>> http://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2018-02-13_21:14:53-upgrade:kraken-x-luminous-distro-basic-smithi/
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 8:58 AM, Jason Dillaman <jdillama@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Yuri,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 11:55 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Outstanding issues:
>>>>
>>>> upgrade/kraken-x => http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/22740 assuming
>>>> Jason, Sage approve
>>>
>>> Do you have a link to the associated failed test run? I would have
>>> expected this to have been fixed indirectly by
>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/20053 as a workaround for the broken
>>> kraken builders.
>>>
>>>> knfs => http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/22995 Sage pls approve.
>>>>
>>>> Abhishek, Alfredo - assuming all agreed and Sage approves, we can
>>>> publish 12.2.3 any time.
>>>>
>>>> Thx
>>>> YuriW
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:15 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 13:36 -0800, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> knfs - pending review/approval from Jeff (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/22995)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, I've flogged it about as far as I can. The problem is that we see
>>>>> OSD_DOWN in the logs after they run. It doesn't seem to have crashed --
>>>>> it just goes unresponsive to pings for a little while.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's about as far as I can carry it -- at this point it'd be nice to
>>>>> have someone with more familiarity with the OSD code take a look and see
>>>>> what they can tell.
>>>>>
>>>>> FWIW, these tests seem to routinely fail on smithi, but we have at least
>>>>> one run on OVH hosts that passed. This leads be to believe that it's
>>>>> something specific to smithi: flaky hw maybe? or possibly load related?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jason
>
>
>
> --
> Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux