Outstanding issues remaining: upgrade/kraken-x => http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/22740 fixed by https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/20451 (thanks for clues Jason!), Abhishek assigned to you for merge knfs => http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/22995 Sage pls approve. On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Jason Dillaman <jdillama@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks -- just looks like that test needs the same blacklist applied > that PR 20053 performed on the other kraken-x upgrade test (or we just > fix the broken builders for kraken so the broken test can be yanked). > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 12:33 PM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Jason >> >> http://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2018-02-13_21:14:53-upgrade:kraken-x-luminous-distro-basic-smithi/ >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 8:58 AM, Jason Dillaman <jdillama@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Yuri, >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 11:55 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Outstanding issues: >>>> >>>> upgrade/kraken-x => http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/22740 assuming >>>> Jason, Sage approve >>> >>> Do you have a link to the associated failed test run? I would have >>> expected this to have been fixed indirectly by >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/20053 as a workaround for the broken >>> kraken builders. >>> >>>> knfs => http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/22995 Sage pls approve. >>>> >>>> Abhishek, Alfredo - assuming all agreed and Sage approves, we can >>>> publish 12.2.3 any time. >>>> >>>> Thx >>>> YuriW >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:15 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 13:36 -0800, Yuri Weinstein wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> knfs - pending review/approval from Jeff (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/22995) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ok, I've flogged it about as far as I can. The problem is that we see >>>>> OSD_DOWN in the logs after they run. It doesn't seem to have crashed -- >>>>> it just goes unresponsive to pings for a little while. >>>>> >>>>> That's about as far as I can carry it -- at this point it'd be nice to >>>>> have someone with more familiarity with the OSD code take a look and see >>>>> what they can tell. >>>>> >>>>> FWIW, these tests seem to routinely fail on smithi, but we have at least >>>>> one run on OVH hosts that passed. This leads be to believe that it's >>>>> something specific to smithi: flaky hw maybe? or possibly load related? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jason > > > > -- > Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html