Re: 12.2.3 QE Luminous validation status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks -- just looks like that test needs the same blacklist applied
that PR 20053 performed on the other kraken-x upgrade test (or we just
fix the broken builders for kraken so the broken test can be yanked).

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 12:33 PM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jason
>
> http://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2018-02-13_21:14:53-upgrade:kraken-x-luminous-distro-basic-smithi/
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 8:58 AM, Jason Dillaman <jdillama@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Yuri,
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 11:55 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Outstanding issues:
>>>
>>> upgrade/kraken-x => http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/22740 assuming
>>> Jason, Sage approve
>>
>> Do you have a link to the associated failed test run? I would have
>> expected this to have been fixed indirectly by
>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/20053 as a workaround for the broken
>> kraken builders.
>>
>>> knfs => http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/22995 Sage pls approve.
>>>
>>> Abhishek, Alfredo - assuming all agreed and Sage approves, we can
>>> publish 12.2.3 any time.
>>>
>>> Thx
>>> YuriW
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:15 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 13:36 -0800, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> knfs - pending review/approval from Jeff (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/22995)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ok, I've flogged it about as far as I can. The problem is that we see
>>>> OSD_DOWN in the logs after they run. It doesn't seem to have crashed --
>>>> it just goes unresponsive to pings for a little while.
>>>>
>>>> That's about as far as I can carry it -- at this point it'd be nice to
>>>> have someone with more familiarity with the OSD code take a look and see
>>>> what they can tell.
>>>>
>>>> FWIW, these tests seem to routinely fail on smithi, but we have at least
>>>> one run on OVH hosts that passed. This leads be to believe that it's
>>>> something specific to smithi: flaky hw maybe? or possibly load related?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jason



-- 
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux