On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 09:48:26AM +0800, Jeegn Chen wrote: > In the daily use of Ceph RGW cluster, we find some pain points when > using current one-bucket-one-data-pool implementation. > I guess one-bucket-multiple-data-pools may help (See the appended > detailed proposal). > What do you think? Overall I like Queries/concerns: - How would this interact w/ the bucket policy lifecycle code? - How would this interact w/ existing placement policy in bucket creation? - At the rgw-admin layer, what tooling should exist to migrate objects between pools for a given bucket? -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Asst. Treasurer E-Mail : robbat2@xxxxxxxxxx GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE05E6F6 A48F6136
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature