Re: seastar starting points

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi folks,

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Casey Bodley <cbodley@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think it's important to have separate
> Messenger/Connection interfaces that expose futures to the application
> though. And ideally we'd be able to call into dpdk from seastar threads
> without requiring a separate thread pool.
>

Pretty much this.  Implementing a distinct Messenger seems better for
isolation, as well.

Matt

-- 

Matt Benjamin
Red Hat, Inc.
315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103

http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage

tel.  734-821-5101
fax.  734-769-8938
cel.  734-216-5309
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux