Re: 12.2.2 status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Nathan Cutler <ncutler@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> all or nothing. if we want to backport the fix of
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21762, we will have to backport the
>> "debian: fix package relationships after" fixes. so i think pull/18589
>> is self-contained. and no additional step is needed.
>>
>> and per http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21762, we need to have it in
>> luminous. but i have no strong opinion on including it in 12.2.2 or
>> post 12.2.2. Vikhyat and Nathan, what do you think?
>
>
> Yes, I tried to make 18589 self-contained by pulling in Kefu's and
> Abhishek's follow-on fixes. I think it would be nice to have it in 12.2.2.

Rebuilt the integration branch with the newer PR and it still fails
with the same reason
http://pulpito.ceph.com/abhi-2017-11-05_11:53:02-ceph-disk-wip-abhi-testing-2017-11-05-0933-distro-basic-vps/
for eg.

Kefu, are there any more commits we need to solve the dependency issue?

Thanks
Abhishek
> Nathan
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux