On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 2:02 AM, Abhishek Lekshmanan <abhishek@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sage Weil <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> It's probably https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/18589 ? > > Looks like it. I'm not sure whether this PR needs to go in for 12.2.2 or > post 12.2.2, and how the ceph-test breaks << 12.2.2 affects this. Can > Kefu/ Ken comment on whether this needs to be included and what > additional steps we need to get the packaging fixed. + vikyat. all or nothing. if we want to backport the fix of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21762, we will have to backport the "debian: fix package relationships after" fixes. so i think pull/18589 is self-contained. and no additional step is needed. and per http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21762, we need to have it in luminous. but i have no strong opinion on including it in 12.2.2 or post 12.2.2. Vikhyat and Nathan, what do you think? > > Thanks > Abhishek > >> >> On Fri, 3 Nov 2017, Abhishek Lekshmanan wrote: >> >>> Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> >>> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Abhishek Lekshmanan <abhishek@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >> Also for the leads, Sage, Yehuda. Jason, Josh, Patrick are there any >>> >> critical PRs that we need to have in 12.2.2 so that we can include >>> >> them in the next round of testing before handing over to QE? >>> > >>> > Please include: >>> > >>> > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/18019 >>> > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/18008 >>> >>> I've added the all the PRs in the milestone with the label wip-abhi-testing, >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+label%3Awip-abhi-testing >>> >>> However all the ubuntu/debian tests in teuthology seem to fail with a >>> dependency issue not seen in centos, >>> >>> For eg: >>> http://pulpito.ceph.com/abhi-2017-11-03_16:49:11-ceph-disk-wip-luminous-backports-distro-basic-vps/ >>> >>> or >>> http://pulpito.ceph.com/abhi-2017-11-03_15:09:21-rados-wip-luminous-backports-distro-basic-smithi/ >>> >>> something in the lines of >>> ceph-mds : Depends: ceph-base (= 12.2.1-688-g83b8263-1trusty) but it is >>> not going to be installed >>> >>> though not sure why these are failing as the packages themselves seem to >>> be present at the chacra url, so something else in the dependency chain >>> somewhere? Has anyone else seen errors of this nature ? >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Abhishek >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>> >>> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> > > -- > Abhishek Lekshmanan > SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, > HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- Regards Kefu Chai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
