Re: Additional backport labels and process improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Vasu Kulkarni <vakulkar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Also I am +1 on NOT creating a new tracker for every backport, this
> seems redundant work, the original tracker can still be used with few
> additional fields to indicate "fixed in master", "fixed in jewel" etc.

I like the additional tickets because it makes it clearer to me what
is complete and what is not. But I agree it's pretty heavyweight to do
it by hand.

I think ceph-workbench (?) automates some of this, but I think we
could automate it further.

- Ken
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux