Re: librados3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 19 Oct 2017, Jason Dillaman wrote:
> As long as we plan to continue to ship librados2 side-by-side with
> librados3 for a while, I'm fine with starting down that path for
> mimic. There are a lot of applications linked against librados2
> floating in the wild.
> 
> For luminous, we could perhaps just drop the "_mempool" member
> variable from bufferlist and chance the semantics where the caller
> needs to add at least a single buffer::raw before the mempool can be
> assigned. That preserves the ABI since we aren't changing the size of
> bufferlist and preserves the mempool functionality (with a little
> extra work).  That tweak would only be needed for the first
> buffer::ptr appended to the bufferlist since subsequent appends can
> just copy the mempool value from the first buffer::ptr.

I think that will still be sufficient for bluestore (which relies on 
mempool accounting to make its cache trimming work).  I can give it a try 
today!

sage

> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 6:43 AM, John Spray <jspray@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:25 AM, kefu chai <tchaikov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> in luminous, we introduced a change not backward compatible with
> >> pre-luminous librados. see see http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21573.
> >> and i cannot see an obvious solution without bumping up the so version
> >> of librados to 3.
> >>
> >> if we have the luxury to do it,  we will be able to give librados an
> >> overhaul. for a todo list, see http://pad.ceph.com/p/librados3.
> >>
> >> what do you think?
> >
> > I've added a couple of items to the pad for deprecated bits to remove
> > when we go up a version.
> >
> > I guess we would do the version bump for Mimic and for Luminous we
> > will just have to apologetically tell people they need to recompile?
> >
> > Or we could have a so.3 version (ABI change only) in Luminous that
> > just bumps the version to force a recompile, and a so.4 version in
> > Mimic that actually makes the API changes?
> >
> > John
> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> Regards
> >> Kefu Chai
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jason
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux