Re: librados3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:25 AM, kefu chai <tchaikov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> in luminous, we introduced a change not backward compatible with
> pre-luminous librados. see see http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21573.
> and i cannot see an obvious solution without bumping up the so version
> of librados to 3.
>
> if we have the luxury to do it,  we will be able to give librados an
> overhaul. for a todo list, see http://pad.ceph.com/p/librados3.
>
> what do you think?

I've added a couple of items to the pad for deprecated bits to remove
when we go up a version.

I guess we would do the version bump for Mimic and for Luminous we
will just have to apologetically tell people they need to recompile?

Or we could have a so.3 version (ABI change only) in Luminous that
just bumps the version to force a recompile, and a so.4 version in
Mimic that actually makes the API changes?

John

>
> --
> Regards
> Kefu Chai
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux