On Thu, 19 Oct 2017, John Spray wrote: > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:25 AM, kefu chai <tchaikov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > in luminous, we introduced a change not backward compatible with > > pre-luminous librados. see see http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21573. > > and i cannot see an obvious solution without bumping up the so version > > of librados to 3. > > > > if we have the luxury to do it, we will be able to give librados an > > overhaul. for a todo list, see http://pad.ceph.com/p/librados3. > > > > what do you think? > > I've added a couple of items to the pad for deprecated bits to remove > when we go up a version. > > I guess we would do the version bump for Mimic and for Luminous we > will just have to apologetically tell people they need to recompile? > > Or we could have a so.3 version (ABI change only) in Luminous that > just bumps the version to force a recompile, and a so.4 version in > Mimic that actually makes the API changes? Yeah, it sounds like this is what we actually want in this case? sage -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
