On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 8:03 AM, Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think that makes sense - having REST APIs will give us a fairly universal > way to plug into many other frameworks. I don't think anyone objects in principle to the idea of a rest api, the issue has been whether anyone is actually up for maintaining a complete one, and the difficulty of doing that without any real users to notice when something is broken. John > > Ric > > > On Sep 14, 2017 4:34 PM, "Boris Ranto" <branto@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I still plan to port the v1 endpoints from calamari to the restful >> module so that it provides a full replacement for calamari rest api and >> so that it could be used by projects like tendlr. >> >> We do document the restful module in the RHCEPH product and several >> people are/were interested in it. I did not hear of any product/app >> being built on top of it yet though. >> >> We can extend the pass through method in the restful module so that it >> is more user friendly for a more robust/useful replacement of the ceph- >> rest-api. >> >> Regards, >> Boris >> >> >> On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 14:43 +0100, John Spray wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > This message is prompted by: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/17530 >> > >> > Questions: >> > - Is anyone using either ceph-rest-api or the restful module? >> > - Is anyone planning on doing any work on either? >> > - Is the CLI pass through of the restful module a sufficient >> > replacement for ceph-rest-api for anyone that was using it? >> > >> > John >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
