Abhishek Lekshmanan <abhishek@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Abhishek Lekshmanan <abhishek@xxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> This email is an attempt to make sure that all are clear on luminous >>>>> v12.2.1 release status. >>>>> >>>>> Dev leads - what is left before we can start QE validation? >>>> >>>> To be merged into master today and then backported: >>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21378 >>>> Luminous backport: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21357 >>>> To be merged into master today and then backported: >>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/20594 >>> >>> Final list of CephFS backports needed for 12.2.1: >>> >>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21323 >>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21114 >>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21107 >>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21357 >>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21322 >>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21384 >>> >> >> So scheduled the relevant suites (rgw,rados,fs) at priority 100 right >> now) for the current PRs targeting Luminous, >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21296#note-15 >> >> if this run goes through, lets merge these PRs to luminous and handover >> to Yuri > > So had failures in many jobs of all the 3 suites due to an ansible > failure, the fs suite, however, has a few failures in this test > (tasks.cephfs.test_misc.TestMisc), is anyone aware of prior failures of > this suite, can be seen in this run for eg. > > http://pulpito.ceph.com/abhi-2017-09-14_11:23:49-fs-wip-luminous-2017-09-14-distro-basic-smithi/1632469/ > > reruns updated at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21296 The cephfs reruns besides the ansible failure failed again at the same test suite (tasks.cephfs.test_misc) , seen at http://pulpito.ceph.com/abhi-2017-09-15_08:41:20-fs-wip-luminous-2017-09-14-distro-basic-smithi/ RADOS suite saw a failure at http://pulpito.ceph.com/abhi-2017-09-15_08:47:22-rados-wip-luminous-2017-09-14-distro-basic-smithi/1635585/ on (workunit test cephtool/test.sh), other than the same ansible related env. failures. both RGW suite saw a few ansible failures again, but no other failures, so let us deem these as passed for now? (Yuri also ran another suite with RGW and these too had only the ansible failures again). In which case we can merge the staged PRs and handover to Yuri for the final QE. Sage, Patrick, Yehuda/Orit thoughts? -- Abhishek Lekshmanan SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
