On 22-8-2017 15:52, Matt Benjamin wrote: > ++kefu > > Matt > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 9:35 AM, kefu chai <tchaikov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Nathan Cutler <ncutler@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> my main concern would be the downstream. how shall we accommodate the >>>> packaging of downstream? for example, what if the boost package >>>> maintainers of SuSE/fedora/debian/ubuntu are not ready to package the >>>> boost version we want to use in future? >>>> >>>> but as long as we don't require newer boost to build, we are safe on >>>> debian and ubuntu at this moment. as boost 1.61 is required for >>>> building ceph, and both debian unstable and ubuntu artful package >>>> boost v1.62. >>> >>> >>> The very latest cutting-edge versions of the distros may ship boost >= 1.61 >>> but the stable versions most likely do not. For FreeBSD I use the ports version = 1.64. Thus far no problems. And since we are talking about boost.... How do I prevent `git submodule ` from downloading all this Boost stuff that I'm not going to use it anyways? So downloading this massive git-tree over and over, is a waste of time and bandwidth. thanx, --WjW -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
