Re: Are we ready for 10.2.8 - core

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Could we also include:

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/14392
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/15529

Hi Josh:

All the outstanding PRs earmarked for 10.2.8 (including the two you mentioned) have been merged. I ran two final suites:

rados http://pulpito.front.sepia.ceph.com:80/smithfarm-2017-06-27_19:13:42-rados-wip-jewel-backports-distro-basic-smithi/ upgrade/hammer-x http://pulpito.front.sepia.ceph.com:80/smithfarm-2017-06-27_15:24:41-upgrade:hammer-x-wip-jewel-backports-distro-basic-vps/

Both are looking pretty good, but these runs did identify two issues that might be significant:

* the upgrade suite has what appears to be a regression: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13381 * the rados suite has this bug (possibly RGW-related) that I haven't seen before: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/20449

The rados suite also had six "infrastructure noise" failures which might be hiding real bugs. I reran these, but Sepia is down ATM.

Do you think 10.2.8 is ready for QE to start its testing?

Nathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux