On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Nathan Cutler <ncutler@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi John: > > I believe we have all the requested CephFS fixes in, now. Do you think > 10.2.8 is ready for QE, as far as CephFS is concerned? Yes, I think we're good. John > > Nathan > > > On 06/14/2017 04:25 PM, John Spray wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 7:49 AM, Dan van der Ster <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Would it be possible to get these into 10.2.8? >>> >>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19677 >>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19762 >>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/20027 >> >> >> I've been a bit behind on reviewing backports lately, sorry about that. >> >> I've merged the first two of those. The third one had a PR that >> didn't have the cephfs label so it got missed. >> >> Nathan, if we have time to do another pre-merge test run for jewel >> backports, then there are a few with label:cephfs and my review on, >> that would just need to go through a fs suite. >> >> Cheers, >> John -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
