Re: Remote execution in ceph-medic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Alfredo Deza <adeza@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:52 AM, John Spray <jspray@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I was pondering this and wondered if you had any existing plans...
>>
>> For doing network testing between two remote nodes, we'll need to be
>> able to spin up some sort of listener on one end, presumably via SSH
>> from a third party node.
>
> What kind of testing warrants this type of setup?

I'm talking about opening a TCP connection between two remote nodes to
verify that the network connectivity is working, and probably doing
this across a large set of pairs e.g. doing an all-to-all ping pong
between OSD nodes.  Obviously, there is just the standard `ping`, but
I'm expecting that we'll want to test using actual TCP traffic in the
port ranges that the OSDs would use.

John

>>
>> I guess the choice here is whether to depend on having ceph-medic
>> already installed on all the nodes (and invoke it with a special
>> --receiver type argument) or whether the tool should inject its code
>> over SSH (e.g. run a big fat python command line with a script in it
>> over SSH).
>>
>
> That is kind of how this works already, borrowing from ceph-deploy: it
> uses SSH to connect
> to remote nodes and execute either system commands or Python code.
>
> In what scenario using a system call or Python code will not gather
> enough information that a server/client
> setup would?
>
>> I lean towards the latter in the interests of making the deployment
>> simple, but I'm not sure what the story is with e.g. selinux in
>> situations like this, whether a server is going to get unhappy about
>> an SSH session that tries to open ports.
>
> Having two processes running to check connectivity sounds a bit
> complicated to handle. One of the things the tool does
> is to cross-check against other nodes in the system, so this would
> potentially mean running an exponential amount of
> processes: for every node to each node in the cluster.
>
> It will be cheaper to perform those checks with either plain Python or
> a system call.
>
> Or maybe you mean some other type of check? What are your ideas on
> "network testing" ?
>>
>> John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux