On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Nathan Cutler <ncutler@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 06/12/2017 08:59 PM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote: >> >> I think so. I do see a large list of issues with backport set to >> jewel. Some of these were already backported but we didn't resolve the >> tracker. I think that we can probably cut 10.2.8 now, and maybe plan >> on early 10.2.9? > > > Orit asked for: > > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19876 > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19757 > > and both have been merged. I went through the rgw issues in the jewel > backport tracker and indeed some were not marked resolved - now fixed. But > there are many still open. I would like to get 10.2.9 out the door > early-ish, yes, but I was hoping that for 10.2.8 as well. . . > > So, do you think it's time for QE to do its testing? > Yes. Yehuda -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
