On 14/06/2017, Radoslaw Zarzynski wrote:
> May we put this somewhere under common/? Although the mentioned
> Clang build failure has been resolved this morning, I bet the constexpr-
> capable variant of strlen (ceph::strlen?) will be very useful in the future.
> Also, I would love to make a clean-up PR based on it.
Feel free! I didn't know if it would be better if Casey stuck it in his
string-reserve-join PR, since he has a similar string_length overload,
or I can make a PR for it later.
--
Senior Software Engineer Red Hat Storage, Ann Arbor, MI, US
IRC: Aemerson@{RedHat, OFTC}
0x80F7544B90EDBFB9 E707 86BA 0C1B 62CC 152C 7C12 80F7 544B 90ED BFB9
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
