Re: teuthology SELinux failures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



all k* suites run with -k testing in nightlies

On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:39 AM, John Spray <jspray@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Vasu Kulkarni <vakulkar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I believe the nodes are pretty much messed up with various kernel
>> versions, ideally we should not be seeing this on distro kernel(as per
>> Boris's comment)
>> so probably we should just schedule kernel client tests on vps so that
>> the smithi's and mira's have only latest distro kernels for other
>> suites for correct testing.
>
> We do need to be able to run with "-k testing" for kcephfs, knfs and
> multimds suites (this has always been the case), and I don't think to
> move all those off of our main test nodes would be realistic.
>
> Folks can already use "-k distro" on their runs (I have use this on
> all my fs suite runs for a long time), it would probably make sense
> for teuthology to use that as the default so that people are not
> getting a random kernel.
>
> John
>
>> Also it would be nice to automatically reimage the nodes back to
>> distro once in a week.
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Boris Ranto <branto@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> I did not check all of the failed tests but those that I checked
>>> complained about dac_read_search. The dac_* family of capabilities
>>> complains that root is trying to access a file that the standard
>>> permissions does not allow him (root) to access (i.e. having 600 and
>>> ceph/ceph user/group).
>>>
>>> However, there is a lot of dac_* failures all throughout the system and
>>> the target contexts are different for these files (i.e. there would
>>> have to be a lot of files like that) so I am inclined to say that this
>>> is a kernel bug. Especially considering that this does not present in
>>> older/stock kernels where there already is a dac_override support.
>>>
>>> Anyway, it should be safe to ignore these (not our processes, not our
>>> files...)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Boris
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 13:23 -0700, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote:
>>>> We started seeing SELinux related failures in recent teuthology run,
>>>> e.g.:
>>>> http://pulpito.ceph.com/yehudasa-2017-05-30_14:55:10-rgw-wip-rgw-mdse
>>>> arch---basic-smithi/
>>>>
>>>> It seems that it's unrelated to the runs themselves, possibly postfix
>>>> that's running in the background is triggering these. Any idea what
>>>> we
>>>> should do there?
>>>>
>>>> Yehuda
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux