On Mar 16, 2017, Alexandre Oliva <oliva@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mar 15, 2017, David Zafman <dzafman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> If it applies cleanly > It did when I created it. And the 3 patches applied cleanly as I prepared to build my patched 10.2.6, so I can't imagine why they would have conflicted for you. Are you sure you were trying to apply them to the jewel branch? > According to my logs, the commits I cherry-picked, that I referenced by > issue, were: > 82f5cc63404ce9f680d714fc85148946f2b2c376 (your patch for 13937) > (cherry picked from commit c51d70e1e837c972e42ddd5fa66f7ca4477b95cc) > b3224a18f6acc7ed54c2162b140a33b6146a16be (Kefu Chai's patch for 17857) -- Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/ You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/ FSF Latin America board member Free Software Evangelist|Red Hat Brasil GNU Toolchain Engineer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
