Re: [PATCH 1/1] EC backfill retries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




If it applies cleanly, base your code off of current jewel and specify any commits that needs to be cherry-picked so I can pull them in. Doing this allows you to send in e-mail again.

Otherwise, create a pull request yourself. Or push it all to the main ceph repo and giving me a branch name.

David


On 3/15/17 1:13 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Mar 10, 2017, David Zafman <dzafman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

     I can't apply your patch because sha1 e3eb1fd isn't in the ceph
repo
That's no surprise; that's the result of my cherry-picking the two
patches I listed as dependencies of mine.

and it won't apply cleanly.
Do you have those two patches in the tree?  (see the first quoted
paragraph below)

I recall one of them was already in jewel or jewel-next when I picked it
up, some time in December or so, but the other wasn't yet.

Anyway, if you do have the two deps, maybe I'll have to rebase.  Just
let me know the target and I'll try to take care of it.  I was targeting
the jewel branch, but I see I failed to make that explicit in my email.
Sorry about that.

On 3/7/17 9:33 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Having applied David Zafman's patch for 13937 and Kefu Chai's for 17857,
I still hit the problem described in issue 18162.  This mostly fixes it.
There are still remaining known problems:

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux