Hi Josh and Sage, are you ok with releasing v10.2.7 from jewel (a64d3e4b33e904aa6585464df8ffff6aafdec10c)? test results passed at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19055#note-13 (with known failures, as far as I can tell) - Ken On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There had been lengthy discussion in #ceph-devel regarding failed > upgrade tests, https://github.com/ceph/teuthology/pull/1055, > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19429 > > We need to decide what to do about this in context of this release. > > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Detailed summary of the QE Validation can be found here >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19055#note-13 >> The following suites were in scope of this point release validation: >> >> rados (subset 35/50 227 jobceph-ansibles) >> rbd >> rgw >> fs >> krbd >> kcephfs >> knfs >> rest >> hadoop - EXCLUDED >> samba - EXCLUDED >> ceph-deploy >> ceph-disk >> upgrade/client-upgrade >> upgrade/hammer-x (jewel) >> upgrade/jewel-x/point-to-point-x >> powercycle >> ceph-ansible >> >> (please let me know if any suites are missing from this ^ list) >> >> ===================== >> Outstanding issues >> >> rados - two jobs failed, need Josh's approval >> krbd - seems similar to previous release, need Ilya's approval >> >> upgrade/client-upgrade >> and >> upgrade/hammer-x (jewel) - suspect >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19429, need Sage/Josh approve >> >> Thx >> YuriW > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
