There had been lengthy discussion in #ceph-devel regarding failed upgrade tests, https://github.com/ceph/teuthology/pull/1055, http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19429 We need to decide what to do about this in context of this release. On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Detailed summary of the QE Validation can be found here > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19055#note-13 > The following suites were in scope of this point release validation: > > rados (subset 35/50 227 jobceph-ansibles) > rbd > rgw > fs > krbd > kcephfs > knfs > rest > hadoop - EXCLUDED > samba - EXCLUDED > ceph-deploy > ceph-disk > upgrade/client-upgrade > upgrade/hammer-x (jewel) > upgrade/jewel-x/point-to-point-x > powercycle > ceph-ansible > > (please let me know if any suites are missing from this ^ list) > > ===================== > Outstanding issues > > rados - two jobs failed, need Josh's approval > krbd - seems similar to previous release, need Ilya's approval > > upgrade/client-upgrade > and > upgrade/hammer-x (jewel) - suspect > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19429, need Sage/Josh approve > > Thx > YuriW -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
