Hi all, I met the same issue when I ran OpenStack tempest API test with radosgw in recent. It is great if we can update swift tests up to date. @Casey, are there special test cases in Ceph used to test Swift API? Could you please share me more information? Thanks a lot! Br, Tone On 29 March 2017 at 02:18, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 28 Mar 2017, Casey Bodley wrote: >> On 03/28/2017 09:51 AM, Rajath Shashidhara wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I am getting started with contributing to Ceph. I sent my first pull >> > request a couple of weeks ago - https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13908 >> > . In testing the feature, I realized that the ceph/swift repository is >> > outdated. I tweaked some relevant functional tests on the >> > openstack/swift repository to run on RadosGW. >> > >> > I was thinking that may be I can port all the functional tests from >> > openstack/swift to work on RGW. This way we can test how well RGW >> > complies with the Swift REST API. I'd like to know if that would be a >> > useful contribution to ceph. Also, since ceph/stack has diverged from >> > openstack/swift (20 commits ahead and 4919 commits behind upstream - >> > openstack/swift as of today), what approach should I take to push these >> > tests ? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Rajath Shashidhara >> > >> > -- >> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> Hi Rajath, >> >> Thanks for looking into this - I think it would be extremely valuable to bring >> our swift tests up to date. Looking at our fork, it appears that most of our >> changes fall into two categories: updating dependencies/bootstrapping, and >> adding 'fails_on_rgw' tags to tests that we know won't pass. >> >> I'm hoping that the latest openstack/swift repo has the correct dependencies, >> so we may not need to carry all of those patches forward. >> >> Rebasing the commits that add our tags sounds tedious, but should be pretty >> straightforward. For new upstream tests that don't pass against rgw, maybe add >> a separate tag like 'new_fails_on_rgw' so that we can go through and evaluate >> each of those once you finish. > > See also: > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/6111 > > sage > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
