On Wed, 14 Dec 2016, Zhi Zhang wrote: > Hi Sage, or others, > > Just a quick question. Which ceph version will be the next long term > support after Hammer? Jewel or Kraken or both? Jewel. The next LTS after that will be Luminous, which is due out in the spring. You can find this information here: http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/releases/ sage > We are using Hammer on production, but still met some bugs which have > been fixed in higher ceph version. And some of the bug fixes are > really not easy to backport because of the code base those fixes > depend on, so we have to fix them or workaround them in our internal > code base. We would like to try avoiding such things later after we > choose a higher version to upgrade. So want to ask for some > suggestions here with stability, compatibility and long-term > supporting into consideration. > > Thanks a lot. > > Regards, > Zhi Zhang (David) > Contact: zhang.david2011@xxxxxxxxx > zhangz.david@xxxxxxxxxxx > > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Sage Weil <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Please continue to target PRs at master; we will cherry-pick -x them to > > kraken. This isn't quite what we usually do (if there is a "usually" > > here), but for RBD we are reverting some half-completed features and we > > don't want those to get merged back into master. > > > > Thanks! > > sage > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
