Hi Sage, or others,
Just a quick question. Which ceph version will be the next long term
support after Hammer? Jewel or Kraken or both?
We are using Hammer on production, but still met some bugs which have
been fixed in higher ceph version. And some of the bug fixes are
really not easy to backport because of the code base those fixes
depend on, so we have to fix them or workaround them in our internal
code base. We would like to try avoiding such things later after we
choose a higher version to upgrade. So want to ask for some
suggestions here with stability, compatibility and long-term
supporting into consideration.
Thanks a lot.
Regards,
Zhi Zhang (David)
Contact: zhang.david2011@xxxxxxxxx
zhangz.david@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Sage Weil <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Please continue to target PRs at master; we will cherry-pick -x them to
> kraken. This isn't quite what we usually do (if there is a "usually"
> here), but for RBD we are reverting some half-completed features and we
> don't want those to get merged back into master.
>
> Thanks!
> sage
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
