On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Dan Mick <dmick@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 09/21/2016 03:29 PM, Sage Weil wrote: >> On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Dan Mick wrote: >>> The upstream docs at http://ceph.com/docs can tend to become out of >>> date. We don't have much process to track things that need doc work. >>> >>> As a start, I propose we add a "docs needed" flag to tracker.ceph.com so >>> that we can at least search things that add or change features through a >>> tracker issue, and a "docs needed" label to github, so we can track it >>> on PRs as well. >>> >>> Thoughts? We can make this happen pretty quickly, and of course it's no >>> perfect lock, but at least it may start contributors and reviewers >>> thinking about the issue. >> >> We can make a 'needs-docs' tag for PRs in github. If they don't block the >> merge, then we can still search for them in open or closed prs, and make a >> point of removing the tag once the docs are eventually updated. >> >> For the tracker, maybe a category for each project instead of a >> separate tracker? Not sure.. >> >> sage > > Seemed like general consensus, so I've added both a "Needs Doc" checkbox > to tracker and a "needs-doc" tag for PRs and GH issues. See how they feel. This is great Dan. Thank you! > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
