Re: ceph v10.2.3 QE validation status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 13 Sep 2016, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
> Please see updates http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46 (after
> incorporating results from the latest runs on tip of jewel branch).
> 
> samba - passed
> 
> khfs - awaiting approval (Greg, John)
> 
> powercycle - awaiting approval (Sage, Loic)

Approved!

Thanks-
sage

> 
> Thx
> YuriW
> 
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Detailed summary of the QE Validation can be found here
> > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46
> >
> > The following suites were in scope of this point release validation:
> >
> > rados (subset 35/50 297 jobs)
> > rbd
> > rgw
> > fs
> > krbd
> > kcephfs
> > knfs
> > rest
> > hadoop
> > samba
> > ceph-deploy
> > ceph-disk
> > upgrade/client-upgrade
> > upgrade/hammer-x (jewel)
> > upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel)
> > powercycle
> > (please let me know if any suites are missing from this ^ list)
> >
> > ==============================
> > Issues requiring approval/decision:
> >
> > rados:
> >    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16516 (approved by DavidZ)
> >
> > rbd:
> >    multiple issues (Jason pls rview/approve, see notes
> > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46)
> >
> > krbd:
> >    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17223
> >    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17221
> >    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17222
> >    (Jason pls rview/approve)
> >
> > knfs
> >    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17192
> >    (Greg pls rview/approve, note: it's similar we saw in hammer point release)
> >
> > samba:
> >    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17184
> >    (Greg pls rview/approve)
> >
> > upgrade/client-upgrade:about:startpage
> >    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16506
> >    (Sage, Sam, Jason pls rview/approve)
> >
> > upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel):
> >    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17176
> >    (Sam, David  pls rview/approve)
> >
> > powercycle:
> >    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17177
> >    (Sage  pls rview/approve)
> >
> > Loic, given that we have high number of issues in this release, if you
> > and dev leads find that we need to add more backports we may consider
> > validating a new point RC (sha1).
> >
> > Thx
> > YuriW
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux