Hi, The run completed at http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2016-08-25_06:39:08-fs-jewel-backports-distro-basic-smithi/ with no valgrind error but a few other failures. Note that it is based on the jewel-backports branch which contains a few more backports in addition to https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10847 and I'm not sure what to blame yet. I'll look into it tomorrow unless you beat me to it :-) Cheers On 24/08/2016 23:03, Gregory Farnum wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> On 24/08/2016 22:46, Gregory Farnum wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Gregory Farnum <gfarnum@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 1:59 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> Hi John, >>>>> >>>>> The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel passed the fs suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-30 except for three valgrind failures). Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> >>>>> P.S. CC'ing Greg because John is on vacation, in case a decision is to be made before he returns. >>>> >>>> Ugh, I went to check these valgrind failures and they're a failed >>>> mutex assert on shutdown. Let me dig into what's happening. :( >>>> -Greg >>> >>> Hmm, we seem to have some badly-colliding backports. If you look at >>> commit ac449472df2978123192d5f22247d8b8bc5efb28 and MDSRank.cc line >>> 242, you'll see it does mds_lock.Unlock() twice in quick succession. >>> :( >>> >>> One of them came in from 7c2eab19, and the other from 1d3a8168. I >>> think maybe the patches got reordered in their backport order or >>> something. >>> >>> Patrick, can you give https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10847 a quick >>> review? Loic, can you then run the failed tests against a backport >>> branch which includes that patch? >> >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10847 has been pushed as part of the jewel-backports integration branch right now and I'll schedule a fs run as soon as it finishes building. Thanks for the quick fix ! > > Sure. Assuming that works out everything else looked good to me. :) > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
