On 24/08/2016 22:46, Gregory Farnum wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Gregory Farnum <gfarnum@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 1:59 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hi John, >>> >>> The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel passed the fs suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-30 except for three valgrind failures). Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> P.S. CC'ing Greg because John is on vacation, in case a decision is to be made before he returns. >> >> Ugh, I went to check these valgrind failures and they're a failed >> mutex assert on shutdown. Let me dig into what's happening. :( >> -Greg > > Hmm, we seem to have some badly-colliding backports. If you look at > commit ac449472df2978123192d5f22247d8b8bc5efb28 and MDSRank.cc line > 242, you'll see it does mds_lock.Unlock() twice in quick succession. > :( > > One of them came in from 7c2eab19, and the other from 1d3a8168. I > think maybe the patches got reordered in their backport order or > something. > > Patrick, can you give https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10847 a quick > review? Loic, can you then run the failed tests against a backport > branch which includes that patch? https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10847 has been pushed as part of the jewel-backports integration branch right now and I'll schedule a fs run as soon as it finishes building. Thanks for the quick fix ! > -Greg > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
