Re: Odd WAL traffic for BlueStore

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



debug bluestore = 20
debug bluefs = 20
debug rocksdb = 5

Thanks!
sage


On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Igor Fedotov wrote:

> Will prepare shortly. Any suggestions on desired levels and components?
> 
> 
> On 22.08.2016 18:08, Sage Weil wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Igor Fedotov wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > > 
> > > While testing BlueStore as a standalone storage via FIO plugin I'm
> > > observing
> > > huge traffic to a WAL device.
> > > 
> > > Bluestore is configured to use 2 450 Gb Intel's SSD: INTEL SSDSC2BX480G4L
> > > 
> > > The first SSD is split into 2 partitions (200 & 250 Gb) for Block DB and
> > > Block
> > > WAL.
> > > 
> > > The second is split similarly and first 200Gb partition allocated for Raw
> > > Block data.
> > > 
> > > RocksDB settings are set as Somnath suggested in his 'RocksDB tuning' . No
> > > much difference comparing to default settings though...
> > > 
> > > As a result when doing 4k sequential write (8Gb total) to a fresh storage
> > > I'm
> > > observing (using nmon and other disk mon tools) significant write traffic
> > > to
> > > WAL device. And it grows eventually from ~10Mbs to ~170Mbs. Raw Block
> > > device
> > > traffic is pretty stable at ~30 Mbs.
> > > 
> > > Additionally I inserted an output for BlueFS perf counters on
> > > umount(l_bluefs_bytes_written_wal & l_bluefs_bytes_written_sst).
> > > 
> > > The resulting values are very frustrating: ~28Gb and 4Gb for
> > > l_bluefs_bytes_written_wal & l_bluefs_bytes_written_sst respectively.
> > Yeah, this doesn't seem right.  Have you generated a log to see what is
> > actually happening on each write?  I don't have any bright ideas about
> > what is going wrong here.
> > 
> > sage
> > 
> > > Doing 64K changes the picture dramatically:
> > > 
> > > WAL traffic is stable at 10-12 Mbs and RAW Block one is at ~400Mbs
> > > BlueFS counters are ~140Mb and 1K respectively.
> > > 
> > > Surely write completes much faster in the second case.
> > > 
> > > No WAL is reported in logs at BlueStore level for both cases.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > High BlueFS WAL traffic is observed when running subsequent random 4K RW
> > > over
> > > the store propagated this way too.
> > > 
> > > I'm wondering why WAL device is involved in the process at all ( writes
> > > happen
> > > in min_alloc_size blocks) operate and why the traffic and written data
> > > volume
> > > is so high?
> > > 
> > > Don't we have some fault affecting 4K performance here?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Here are my settings and FIO job specification:
> > > 
> > > ###########################
> > > 
> > > [global]
> > >          debug bluestore = 0/0
> > >          debug bluefs = 1/0
> > >          debug bdev = 0/0
> > >          debug rocksdb = 0/0
> > > 
> > >          # spread objects over 8 collections
> > >          osd pool default pg num = 32
> > >          log to stderr = false
> > > 
> > > [osd]
> > >          osd objectstore = bluestore
> > >          bluestore_block_create = true
> > >          bluestore_block_db_create = true
> > >          bluestore_block_wal_create = true
> > >          bluestore_min_alloc_size = 4096
> > >          #bluestore_max_alloc_size = #or 4096
> > >          bluestore_fsck_on_mount = false
> > > 
> > >          bluestore_block_path=/dev/sdi1
> > >          bluestore_block_db_path=/dev/sde1
> > >          bluestore_block_wal_path=/dev/sde2
> > > 
> > >          enable experimental unrecoverable data corrupting features =
> > > bluestore
> > > rocksdb memdb
> > > 
> > >          bluestore_rocksdb_options =
> > > "max_write_buffer_number=16,min_write_buffer_number_to_merge=2,recycle_log_file_num=16,compaction_threads=32,flusher_threads=8,max_background_compactions=32,max_background_flushes=8,max_bytes_for_level_base=5368709120,write_buffer_size=83886080,level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=4,level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=400,level0_stop_writes_trigger=800"
> > > 
> > >          rocksdb_cache_size = 4294967296
> > >          bluestore_csum = false
> > >          bluestore_csum_type = none
> > >          bluestore_bluefs_buffered_io = false
> > >          bluestore_max_ops = 30000
> > >          bluestore_max_bytes = 629145600
> > >          bluestore_buffer_cache_size = 104857600
> > >          bluestore_block_wal_size = 0
> > > 
> > >          # use directory= option from fio job file
> > >          osd data = ${fio_dir}
> > > 
> > >          # log inside fio_dir
> > >          log file = ${fio_dir}/log
> > > ####################################
> > > 
> > > #FIO jobs
> > > #################
> > > # Runs a 4k random write test against the ceph BlueStore.
> > > [global]
> > > ioengine=/usr/local/lib/libfio_ceph_objectstore.so # must be found in your
> > > LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> > > 
> > > conf=ceph-bluestore-somnath.conf # must point to a valid ceph
> > > configuration
> > > file
> > > directory=./fio-bluestore # directory for osd_data
> > > 
> > > rw=write
> > > iodepth=16
> > > size=256m
> > > 
> > > [bluestore]
> > > nr_files=63
> > > bs=4k        # or 64k
> > > numjobs=32
> > > #############
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > > 
> > > 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux