Re: Sequential write performance on cloning images

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 10:41 PM, Ridge Chen <ridge.chen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I have tested on hammer and jewel, the results are similar. Is it expected?

In this case, there actually would not be an extra copy-up since you
already performed the necessary copy-ups during the "dd" against
"clone-vol1". The only difference, on the librbd side, is that the
write operation would have an additional "assert object exists"
operation before the write operation.

Do you see similar differences with the librbd cache disabled and the
object map disabled?



-- 
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux