Re: jewel -> master upgrade

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 28 Jun 2016, Nathan Cutler wrote:
> I have been working on http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14995 which has been
> causing lots of failures in the upgrade suites, and now I think I know why.
> 
> At the moment, the highest tag in jewel is v10.2.2, while in master the
> highest tag is v10.2.0 - this can be verified by doing "git describe" in both
> branches.
> 
> Since the version numbers of all the packages are derived from "git describe",
> we now have a situation where the package managers (rpm, dpkg, etc.) consider
> master packages (i.e. packages built from the master branch) to be _older_
> than jewel packages.
> 
> The solution, I guess, would be to add a v11.0.0 tag to master.

That would explain it.

We can just add a tag and not bother doing a release build for now... that 
is probably the simplest.  Any objections?

sage

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux