Would be great indeed. As it's already there, it can be done already now. Sebastien On Mon, 2016-06-27 at 15:25 -0700, Samuel Just wrote: > The something like ceph_test_rados could then be wired into > ceph-qa-suite to be tested with osd thrashing to ensure that ordering > works and continues to work as expected. > -Sam > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Sage Weil <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi Sebastien, > > > > Do you mind updating us on the current status of > > libradosstriper? Where > > does it stand feature-wise with what you need, how are you > > currently using > > it or how do you plan to use it, and what is still missing? > > > > Also, one thing we really want to see is test coverage for the code > > so > > that we can comfortably point users toward it. This ideally would > > look > > something like the ceph_test_rados_api_* tests that verify > > individual > > operations behave as expected, and/or something like > > ceph_test_rados that > > throws random operations at is and verifies it returns correct > > results > > that match its in-memory model. > > > > Thanks! > > sage > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph- > > devel" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
