On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 1:33 AM, Sage Weil <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 4 Jun 2016, Haomai Wang wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Sage Weil <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > I updated the PR with an additional commit that simplifies the >> > confounder. It seems like we only need the confoudner at teh beginning of >> > the session, not for every message, since the signature and encryption >> > state is chained from the previous frame. Is that right? >> > >> > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/9461/commits/45766fed1864733c5216a7b50f11cce256338170 >> > >> > Full PR: >> > >> > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/9461 >> > >> > -- >> > >> > Also, I just realized that now might be a good time to address the ability >> > to multiplex different endpoints (sessions) into the same connection. We >> > could add it later with the msgr feature bits, but it'll probably be >> > simpler not to have to support two variants of the protocol. On the other >> > hand, it's a lot more complicated. :( >> >> What's the use case? different session shares the same connection? Do >> you mean different messenger instance will share the same connection >> pool? > > Many OSD's in the same unix process, sharing the same messenger connection > pool, eventually using SPDK/DPDK. OH, great to push this! > > sage -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
