On 05/04/2016 04:22 AM, Handzik, Joseph wrote: > [...] >> I'm giving all the above for context, but what I really need to know >> from the ceph-devel community is: Does anyone have any concerns with >> adding libstoragemgmt as a Ceph dependency? It would only work for the >> standard Linux flavors and distros (Rhel and Centos, OpenSuse and >> SLES, Debian and Ubuntu). The features I'm adding would be no-ops or >> disabled for other distros unless someone in the community finds a way >> to distribute libstoragemgmt for their operating environment or finds >> an adequate replacement for the functionality. It's also worth noting >> that I'm completely dependent on the previously mentioned 1.3 release >> of libstoragemgmt, which is why I've waited on this for a while (the >> blueprint was initially intended for Jewel). > > The current distros upstream currently buidls on are: > > centos 7 > ubuntu 16.04 > ubuntu 14.04 > debian 8 (jessie) > > Other packages are all down downstream (e.g., opensuse and sles). > > Anyway, is libstoragemgt available for the above? > > [JH] - I'm seeing packages for both 16.04 and 14.04, along with Debian Jessie and Centos7. I think my biggest challenge will be figuring out *exactly* when the 1.3 release of libstoragemgmt is available for all these distros. I don't plan to submit a pull until I can confirm that. Speaking for a downstream, a quick search shows we've got libstoragemgmt 1.2.x (not 1.3) on the current latest versions of openSUSE and SLES. Regards, Tim -- Tim Serong Senior Clustering Engineer SUSE tserong@xxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
